The ‘Precariat’, a term first coined by economist Guy Standing, refers to an emerging, multi-dimensional class in society, forced into an unstable relationship with employment. People who, through no fault of their own, but as a by-product of the global capitalist system painfully birthed into the 21st Century, cannot obtain secure work.
The Precariat itself is truncated and flexible, imperfectly defined, but loosely encompassing an increasing number of people. The first class in history to be systematically losing its rights. Why this matters goes beyond simple human decency, as the result is growing political disaffection, and anger.
More than any other class, the Precariat has suffered during the COVID-era lockdowns. In the UK, many temporary workers, or those reliant upon ‘zero-hour’ contracts, constituting the ‘Precariat’, were ineligible for furlough scheme support. In the US, many families have been forced to survive largely on a single $1200 stimulus package in March. Only in late December was another stimulus deal reached.
Different employment sectors have also been disproportionately impacted by lockdowns. Whilst the tech industry has unsurprisingly fared very profitably, hospitality has struggled, with few signs for optimism in the future. I explored the full damage this has caused in a previous post, whilst levying the accusation it resembled a new prohibition.
Earlier this week, we were mercifully rid of the full lockdown restrictions, followed by the additional, positive news, of a newly approved COVID vaccine. Fully deserved congratulations to the incredible researchers, especially those representing Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca. With the beginning of the end in sight,… Continue Reading →
As of 2016, over 7 million Britons were reportedly in precarious employment, equating to roughly one in five of the available work-force. The previous decade had witnessed a rise in 2 million temporary, or zero-hour contracts offered by businesses. Agencies matching this demand contribute thousands of temporary workers to a number of different businesses, like Argos, Tesco, and Sainsbury’s, treating them as disposable, to be potentially fired without a moment’s notice.
This possibility becomes increasingly likely in periods of national uncertainty, like the aftermath of Brexit. As of writing, details of the deal have yet to fully emerge.
Naturally, this shift towards unstable labour has primarily impacted young adults.
This trend, as Standing explains in his first book, The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, arose from economic measures introduced in the 1980’s. Designed to increase labour market flexibility, and taken as a necessity to maintain jobs and investments, corporations were delivered the costless ability to alter employment levels at will. The result transferred the onus of insecurity onto the workers.
Subsequently, the ‘proletariat’, understood in the traditional Marxist sense, is shrinking, alongside the ‘salariat’, undercut by the growing Precariat. As mentioned before, the latter is an internally fractured class, and, as Standing projected, a ‘political monster’.
“The ‘Precariatised Mind’: You don’t know what is the best thing to be doing with your time… You’re constantly faced with uncertainty… Always on the edge of unsustainable debt… systematically losing the great rights… they don’t see, in the political spectrum, parties or politicians who represent their interests”Standing
For many people, this appears to reflect the new reality of existence.
The newly globalised market of the 21st Century has detracted from the value of labour. Just as during the Industrial Revolution, mechanisation and technological advancements in the workplace have rendered certain jobs obsolete.
There has been a recent and steady decline in the number of well-paid, skilled, standard jobs in manufacturing industry, for example, coupled with the stagnation or reduction of real wages, and a greater reliance on those actual wages, no longer receiving additional benefits like paid holiday.
Consequently, we have witnessed a surge in people habituated to unstable patterns of work-for-labour. In the desperate battle to obtain work, the Precariat is forced into compulsory, unpaid voluntary ‘labour’, but would not succeed without it. This can involve retraining, networking, refining CVs, filling out forms – consuming their time, for no actual advancement, since people can often only access jobs below their qualifications, leading to frustration.
It has often been to the detriment of young people. The majority of my generation likely fits into what Standing describes as ‘Progressives’ within the Precariat – educated, qualified individuals promised opportunities and careers, finding themselves disillusioned. This category is characterised by anger. There’s an unspoken acknowledgement that we must be vastly overqualified for any job, at even an entry level, whilst future qualifications will not improve job prospects.
All against the backdrop of an expanding plutocracy of multi-billionaires garnering absurd levels of finance and power.
Alone, Jeff Bezos’ net worth ranks him just outside the top 50 richest nations in the world. In coalition with Bill Gates and Elon Musk, those three would crack the top 25. Richest. Countries.
Let’s explore the relationship between Amazon President Bezos and his employees. During the pandemic, Bezos almost doubled his net worth, increasing from $113 billion to $203 billion as of October 13th. Which he isn’t required to pay tax on. As of September 2020, Amazon employed around 1,125,300, with warehouse workers earning just under £13/hour. From just his pandemic earnings, Bezos could give every worker an £80,000 bonus and be no poorer than nine months ago.
But many are not salaried workers, and shifts are not guaranteed. They are offered on a first-come, first-serve basis, being the responsibility of workers to obtain available employment. Additionally, workers are subjected to incredibly poor conditions. Warehouse workers might be expected to maintain packaging rates of up to 700 items each hour, equated to one every five seconds. Monitored by an algorithm, they can be fired for falling behind two or three times. Managers reportedly ignore medical dispensations, and allow only two, 15 minute breaks each shift.
This largely fits with employers’ expectations of the Precariat – high demand for their personal responsibility, without the corresponding monetary benefits.
Sociologist Tracy Shildrick has explored the rise in people who are unemployed. It is rarely by their own volition, despite perpetuating, negative stereotypes of ‘benefit thieves’. Instead, most people are suffering a cycle of low-pay/no-pay labour, forcing them into poor work which doesn’t represent a stepping-stone into more profitable work with more security in the future.
It is not a result of poor attitude. In fact, most of the people Shildrick surveyed demonstrated keen affection for work and a desire for employment, even where they calculated that living off benefits would be more profitable. The system prevents the Precariat from accessing stable work or careers.
This trend could be politically dangerous. Standing’s first book, in 2011, hailed the coming of a new ‘political monster’, which he later recognised seemed to have come into fruition. He explains:
Whether knowingly or otherwise, membership in the Precariat leads to frustration and disillusionment. It leads to a detachment from the state, from the identity of employment, from their sense of status. People define themselves by their careers, leaving the Precariat with nothing.
Insecure people vote emotionally and are more susceptible to fear-mongering claims. The ‘fake news’ cycle speaks to them, justifying their anger at something they can’t otherwise explain. They wilfully ignore rationality in favour of hatred directed towards perceived opponents.
Ken Loach’s social documentary, Sorry We Missed You, offers a brilliant exploration of the strains of this new lifestyle. His comments from the interview below resonate with the topics I have discussed here:
This post isn’t designed as an accusation, merely an assessment of what I regard as an unnatural state of affairs. Personally, I believe the existence of billionaires is inherently wrong, when so many people are struggling just to get by.
“Creating a good society is what all of us should do, however tiny our contribution might be”
Thanks for reading! I regularly post a mixture of short stories, travel posts, and contemporary commentaries like this one.
If you enjoyed this, why not check out the latest posts?
Tension lashed across the courtyard, whipping and cracking against the walls. Nervous onlookers peered through the trembling glass at the mass of protestors below. In turn, the jostling crowd spat frenzied ire at the building, slurring vague demands into their disgusted tirade. Gazing at the assembly from afar, one man beamed outwardly. Alfie Darkson. He… Continue Reading →
The wonder of technological potential is ceaseless. It’s projected that, within the next couple of years, woolly mammoths might be resurrected, to immense consequences. A long-extinct species might once again roam the earth. However bleak today might seem, astounding technological innovations always have the potential to dramatically alter the world. Whether beneficial or not, we’re… Continue Reading →
Forgive the deliberately provocative title, though it is at least relevant. Many have attributed the rise in players ‘taking a knee’ to nothing more than virtue signalling. I’ve always optimistically assumed that claim to be false, but big decisions are on the horizon. The key factor is determining whether substance exists in football’s virtue signalling…. Continue Reading →